Malicious browser extensions can steal data, hijack sessions, and bypass traditional controls. Learn why they’re a SaaS governance problem—and how to manage risk at the workforce edge.
.avif)
Browser extensions are now a normal part of how work gets done. Employees install them to manage passwords, block distractions, summarize content, connect tools, and speed up everyday tasks.
At the same time, malicious browser extensions—and legitimate extensions that later turn malicious—have become a growing security concern. Not because they are flashy or novel threats, but because they operate quietly inside the browser, where most modern work actually happens.
For security teams, the issue isn’t just that malicious browser extensions exist. The issue is that they expose a broader gap in how organizations govern software at the workforce edge—where employees self-serve tools outside traditional IT and security workflows.
A malicious browser extension is a browser add-on that performs harmful actions while appearing legitimate to the user.
Some extensions are malicious by design. Others start out benign and later introduce malicious behavior through updates or supply chain compromise. In both cases, the extension is typically installed directly by the user, often from an official browser store, and granted permissions that allow deep interaction with web activity.
From the user’s perspective, nothing looks unusual. The extension continues to function as expected, just with additional capabilities running quietly in the background.
Once installed, malicious browser extensions can perform a range of actions that matter to security teams, including:
What makes these actions particularly difficult to manage is not just what extensions can do, but where they do it: inside legitimate browser sessions, after authentication has already occurred.
For most organizations, the browser is now the primary interface to work. Email, collaboration tools, CRM systems, cloud consoles, and AI tools are all accessed through web browsers.
Malicious browser extensions operate directly in this environment. They don’t need to bypass authentication or exploit vulnerabilities in SaaS platforms. They observe and interact with activity that already looks legitimate.
Most security tooling was not designed to monitor browser-level behavior:
As a result, extension-driven activity often blends in with normal user behavior.
Browser extensions are installed individually, approved implicitly, and rarely reviewed after the fact. This mirrors the same dynamics that led to shadow SaaS and shadow AI adoption—only with even less visibility.
Malicious browser extensions are often treated as a niche browser security problem. In practice, they follow a familiar pattern:
Browser extensions are software. They are self-served, integrated into workflows, and capable of accessing sensitive data. The reason malicious extensions are effective is not just their technical capability—it’s that they often fall outside existing governance frameworks.
A common response to browser extension risk is to catalog installed extensions and assess them based on permissions or known indicators.
That visibility is useful, but limited.
Permissions don’t reflect real-world behavior. Benign extensions can become risky over time. Static lists don’t help during active user sessions. And inventories don’t address how or why extensions are adopted in the first place.
Without governance, extension management remains reactive.
To secure the workforce edge, organizations must bring browser extensions into the same governance framework used for SaaS applications and AI tools.
They are software that employees self-serve. As such, they deserve the same fundamentals:
Because browser extensions are installed, used, and granted permissions in the browser, this governance must operate there as well.
Malicious browser extensions are not an edge case. They are one example of a broader shift in how software enters the organization.
As SaaS, AI tools, and browser extensions continue to proliferate, risk increasingly originates at the workforce edge, not in centrally managed infrastructure. Governing this environment requires visibility and control where software is actually adopted and used.
This is where browser-native governance becomes practical. By operating directly in the browser, solutions like Nudge Security’s browser extension give security teams real-time visibility into workforce software usage and the context around it—without relying solely on audits or after-the-fact alerts. Instead of treating browser extensions as a separate problem, they can be governed alongside SaaS and AI tools using the same principles and policies.
Teams that focus only on individual threats will remain reactive. Teams that govern how software is adopted and used—across the workforce edge—build resilience by design.
Treating browser extensions as first-class software assets helps close a critical gap in modern security programs and brings consistency to how organizations manage risk in a SaaS-first world.
